File #: MIN-05:077    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Minutes Status: Passed
File created: 10/11/2005 In control: Metropolitan Area Planning Commission
On agenda: Final action: 11/8/2005
Title: Minutes for the MAPC meeting on October 11, 2005.
Related files: ORD-05:174, ORD-05:179, ORD-05:182
title
Minutes for the MAPC meeting on October 11, 2005.
body
Metropolitan Area Planning Commission Minutes, October 11, 2005

Commissioners Present: Beadles, Gott, Day, Roberts, Krennerich, Harpole, Halsey
Commissioners Absent: Moore, Sawyer
Staff Present: Crego, Harris, Martin

Chairman Beadles called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

Chairman Beadles announced prior to calling the meeting to order that item RZ-05-22 had been withdrawn by the applicants, and that item FP-05-10 should not have been included on the agenda, and would not be considered tonight.

The Chair announced that minutes of the September 13, 2005 meeting were not ready for review.

1. RP-05-69 Sid Pickle requests approval of a 3-Lot/1.21 acre replat, and review of a conceptual layout for Craighills, a residential development on 20 acres in an R-2 Multi-Family District. The subject property is a potion of the former golf course site on Craighead Forest Road. The Chair explained that the two items would be considered separately, beginning with the review of the conceptual layout. Terry Bare was present as proponent for the item, and recounted some of the recent history of the property. He also stated the owners of the subject property had been in contact with owners of the adjoining properties in an effort to develop a joint plan for the 80 acres that comprise the former golf course site. Mr. Bare also stated that the owner would like to build another group of three four-plexes next to the ones currently under construction. The conceptual layout shows a north-south street connecting Craighead Forest Road with Makala Lane. It also shows a proposed east-west connector, the location of which could be adjusted to meet proposed roadways on the adjacent properties. Mr. Day asked if the detention pond was adequate for the whole 20 acres. Mr. Bare stated that it would be adequate for the 20 acres and that, in response to a request by the City Engineer; the pond area had been increased by about one...

Click here for full text