File #: MIN-91:1622    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Minutes Status: Passed
File created: 10/8/1991 In control: Metropolitan Area Planning Commission
On agenda: Final action: 10/22/1991
Title: METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 8, 1991
Related files: ORD-91:971, ORD-91:972, ORD-91:973, ORD-91:974, ORD-91:975
title
METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 8, 1991
body
MEMBERS PRESENT: Coleman, Patteson, Bahn, Vance, McCracken, Damron, Little

MEMBERS ABSENT: Aycock, Blalock

The minutes of the 9-4-91 meeting were approved as prepared.

#1 SU91-16 Pat South requested approval of placement of a mobile home at 5000 Peachtree Avenue.

A motion to approve the request was made by Mr. Patteson and second by Mr. McCracken. Voting was 5 in favor, 0 opposed. REQUEST APPROVED.

#2 SU91-17 Betty Foster requested approval of placement of a mobile home on Foster Drive, ΒΌ mile east of Hwy. 141.

Several in attendance voiced opposition to this request for mobile home placement. It was stated by those in attendance, who also presented a petition containing many signatures of others opposed to the request. It was stated that although there are eight (8) mobile homes and three (3) houses on the street now, most of which are rental properties, they were opposed to additional mobile homes being placed especially for rental use. As stated by the petitioner this lot was set aside in the original survey, before its annexation, for placemen of a mobile home but she had not placed one there prior to now. Ms. Foster also stated that approval of the septic system had been granted prior to annexation.

Ending the discussion was a motion by Mr. Patteson and second by Mr. Little to approve the request. Voting was 4 in favor, 1 opposed, 1 abstaining. REQUEST APPROVED.

#3 AZ91-4 Dennis Combs and Cindy Mey requested approval of annexation and a zoning classification of R-1 for 3.28 acres. This property is located on the east side of S. Caraway Road, south of Nash Lane.

It was explained that these petitioners had signed a petition and paid their share of the fees for an annexation that took place in December, 1989. When that annexation was completed by legal description they had been left off. A motion to approve was made by Mr. Coleman and second by Mr. Damron. Voting was 6 in favor, 0 opposed...

Click here for full text