File #: MIN-01:1516    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Minutes Status: Passed
File created: 1/16/2001 In control: Metropolitan Area Planning Commission
On agenda: Final action: 2/13/2001
Title: Minutes for the MAPC meeting on January 16, 2001.
Related files: ORD-01:848
title
Minutes for the MAPC meeting on January 16, 2001.
body
MINUTES
METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 16, 2001

MEMBERS PRESENT: Beadles, Damron, Gott, Krennerich, Pitts, Phillips, and Gill

MEMBERS ABSENT: Little and Shaw

It was noted that a quorum was not present at the regular meeting scheduled for January 9th, thus necessitating its re-scheduling to this date. The minutes of the December 12, 2000 meeting were approved as prepared.

#1 RZ01-01 Darrell Canfield requested rezoning, from R-3 Residential to C-3 Commercial, of Lots 59 and 60 of Keich’s 1st Addition (0.36 acres), generally located at 5203 East Nettleton.

A motion to recommend City Council approval of the rezoning was made by Mr. Krennerich and seconded by Mr. Gill. Voting was 6 in favor, 0 opposed, MOTION CARRIED, REQUEST APPROVED.

#2 PUD01-01 Karen & Kenneth Tyson requested preliminary approval of Phase I of Katlyn Manor, a 57 unit Planned Unit Development (PUD) on Linda Kerr Minor Plat property, generally located on the west side of South Caraway Road, just north of Golf Course Drive.

After presentation of the proposal by the applicant’s engineer, area resident Carolyn Stockwell, on behalf of numerous neighborhood residents, recommended that the Commission approve the development. Steve Metcalf, a nearby resident on Craighead Forest Road, also endorsed the project and asked that the back gate shown for Phase II be kept closed and locked. Chairman Beadles advised Metcalf that Phase I was all that was under consideration at this time, and that the gate issue would be addressed as part of Phase II consideration in the future. Sandra Aiken, owner of Lot 7 in the adjoining subdivision, said that she had not had the opportunity to meet with and hear the applicant’s description of the proposed project, as many of the other neighbors had, but that she was not for the development plan.

She expressed concern regarding pedestrian and vehicular safety and access; increased traffic on...

Click here for full text