File #: MIN-89:1583    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Minutes Status: Passed
File created: 3/14/1989 In control: Metropolitan Area Planning Commission
On agenda: Final action: 4/11/1989
Title: METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 14, 1989
Related files: ORD-89:1313, ORD-89:1312, ORD-89:1311, ORD-89:1300
title
METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING OF MARCH 14, 1989
body
PRESENT: McCracken, Sloan, Vance, Blalock, Lamberth, Smock, Aycock

ABSENT: Harris, Lusby

RZ89-1 Mr. Bob Newell presented the request of William P. and Goldie Dabbs for rezoning a 21.2 acre tract of land at the South and Southeast side of the intersection of U.S. Highway 63 Bypass and Woodsprings Road from R-1, Residential to C-3, Intermediate Business District. Mr. Vance made a motion to approve the request with the stipulations that a site development plan be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit and that before City Council adoption of the ordinance on third reading, the applicant’s engineer assures that there is adequate right-of-way on Wood Springs Road and that the right-of-way be reflected on the plat, as necessary. The motion was seconded by Mr. Blalock. The request was approved on a vote of 5 in favor, 1 opposed and1 abstention.

RZ89-2 Gerald and Frances Barnett requested a rezoning for a 1.74 acre tract located on the South side of Race Street, 531.6 West of Stadium Boulevard from R-1 Residential, to C-3 Intermediate Business District. Mr. Sloan made a motion to approve the rezoning request with the stipulation that funding of an escrow for Race Street improvements be worked out with the City. The motion was seconded by Mr. Aycock. The motion was approved on a vote of 6 in favor. 0 opposed.

RZ89-3 Bob Bennett requested approval of rezoning from R-2 to C-5, Quiet Zone, for Lots 5 and 6 of Block 2, Patrick’s Second Addition, located at the Northeast corner of East Matthews and Houghton (Houston) Road. Motion was made by Mr. Vance to approve the rezoning request, subject to the stipulations that a site development plan be approved prior to issuance of a building permit which addresses the building site elevation and access, that the replat be corrected to eliminate confusion and that if a replat needed to be approved, it is hereby approved. The motion was seconded by...

Click here for full text