File #: MIN-91:1623    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Minutes Status: Passed
File created: 10/22/1991 In control: Metropolitan Area Planning Commission
On agenda: Final action: 11/12/1991
Title: METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 22, 1991
Related files: ORD-91:970
title
METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 22, 1991
body
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vance, Patteson, Little, Coleman, Damron, McCracken, Bahn, Blalock

MEMBERS ABSENT: Aycock

#1 PP91-6 Bob Harrison requested final approval of Southside Estates 2nd Addition containing 15 lots on 5.895 acres. The property is located south of Parker Road and will be an extension westward of Green Meadow Lane.

It was noted that the items discussed when the plans were submitted for preliminary approval had been addressed on the final plans. The City Engineer commented that the street improvements have not been completed in Phase I of this subdivision and should be prior to beginning construction in Phase II.

Mr. McCracken made a motion to grant final approval subject to the improvements being completed on Green Meadow Lane in Phase I to the City’ Engineer’s approval before construction is begun on the streets in Phase II. The motion was second by Mr. Bahn. Voting was 7 in favor, 0 opposed. REQUEST APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS.

#2 PUF91-1 Jim Lindsey, Lindsey and Associates Realtors requested preliminary approval of plans for a Residential Planned Unit Development on 13.22 acres. The development will contain 144 living units in 12 buildings along with a resident manager’s living unit and other accommodations. The property is located west of Harrisburg Road, south of the Gladiolus Farm and north of the Shadow Ridge Subdivision.

There were many in attendance to voice their opposition to this request for a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The first item to be discussed was the filing date of the PUD. A.C. Williams, spokesman for much of the group present, questioned whether the nine (9) day deadline has been met for submitting the preliminary plans and asked that the Commission not review the item at this meeting. Several interpretations of Ordinance No. 1962 were offered before Mr. Bahn made a motion to review the item stating that he felt that the regulations for nine (9) calendar...

Click here for full text