title
MAPC MINUTES
APRIL 24, 1990
body
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Sloan, Mr. Blalock, Mr. Coleman, Mr. Vance, Mr. McCracken
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mr. Patteson, Mr. Aycock, Mr. Lamberth, Mr. Smock
#1 SP90-3 Robert Reese requested site plan approval for a dry cleaning business to be located on the southwest corner of Caraway Road and Race Street.
A motion was made by Mr. Vance and seconded by Mr. Coleman to authorize the Executive Committee of the MAPC, the City Planner and the City Engineer to set a meeting with Mr. Rees to review and/or approve a revised site plan. A further statement was made that said plan may be referred back to the MAPC for a decision. Voting was 5 in favor, 0 opposed. MOTION APPROVED.
#2 PP90-2 Coy Mac Boyd and Dean Tyrer requested preliminary approval of Ridge Pointe Subdivision, containing 293 lots, on approximately 320 acres. The subdivision is located on the north side of Woodsprings Road, west of Friendly Hope Road.
Mr. Vance made a motion to grant conceptual approval of Ridge Pointe Subdivision, with the developers and their engineer to review the items of discussion, which are as follows:
1. Most of property is out of City and needs to be annexed first ( already in progress )
2. North street is too long cul-de-sac, needs to connect to south street to form loop
3. Where is clubhouse/ recreational facilities?
4. Is Lot 53, Block C buildable? (Shown below BL)
5. Difficult to determine boundaries of land on which Block C, Lots 1-17, Block D, part of Lots 13-15, 32, 33, 38, 39, 43, 44 & 47, and golf course (part) are located.
6. Commercial strip is not appropriate along this part of 226, and is not at an intersection
7. What are the strip of land south of Lot 85, Block F, and the “Resd” strip of land south of Lot 26, Block A, to be used for?
8. Looks more like SF subdivision w/golf course, than golf course w/SF subdivision
9. Street right-of-ways
10. Consider an arterial, possible along the section line
11. Add street names to plat
12. Consider phased development
13. Emergency entrance/ exit behind proposed clubhouse
14. Redesign streets to try to eliminate extremely long cul-de-sacs.
15. Planned unit development option
16. Address possible problems with soil conservation
Mr. Coleman seconded the motion. Voting was 4 in favor, l abstaining. MOTION APPROVED.