File #: COM-08:051    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Other Communications Status: Filed
File created: 5/12/2008 In control: Finance & Administration Council Committee
On agenda: Final action: 5/20/2008
Title: Request for Proposal Independent Actuarial and Financial Study of Pension Plan
Sponsors: Human Resources, Mayor's Office
Indexes: Employee benefits, Financial reports and other communications
Attachments: 1. Actuarial Proposal Update, 2. Actuaries Recomendations

title

Request for Proposal Independent Actuarial and Financial Study of Pension Plan

body

City of Jonesboro

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

INDEPENDENT ACTUARIAL AND FINANCIAL STUDY OF PENSION PLAN

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

 

I.                     INTRODUCTION

The City of Jonesboro is seeking a qualified proposal to perform an independent actuarial study as of January 1, 2008, of its Retirement Plan for Employees of City of Jonesboro, Arkansas (the “Plan”) administered by Principal Life Insurance Company and an overall evaluation of the plan relative to its investment portfolio and management.  A summary of the Plan’s provisions is attached as Exhibit “A”.

A.                     The City of Jonesboro is committed to providing a meaningful retirement benefit for its employees who commit their employment career to service on behalf of the City and the community.  To that end, the City has established a defined benefit pension plan to assist employees in providing for their retirement security.  Currently the City’s pension plan is a defined benefit plan providing a unit benefit of 1.5 percent of its final average monthly compensation times years of accredited service. 

B.                     Several of the current employees have previously participated in the Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System (APERS).  APERS provides a more valuable retirement benefit for long term employees who participate under APERS, however, the cost of participation of the plan (5% of employee contribution and a designated employer contribution) of 11.05% of pay for the upcoming year) exceeds significantly the cost of the City’s current defined benefit pension plan.

 The assets of the Plan are currently invested in various funds under a defined benefit plan managed and administered by the Principal Life Insurance Company (“Principal”).

As of January 1, 2007, the total valuation assets in the Plan amounted to $6,187,027.

There is a Finance Committee that advises the City Council, who makes decisions regarding the Plan.

 

 

II.                     SCOPE OF SERVICES

A.                     Review and comment on the January 1, 2006 and January 1, 2007 (and January 1, 2008, if available), Actuarial Valuation for the Plan.

B.                     Review and comment on assumptions and reliability of actuarial valuation received for 2006, 2007 and 2008, if available.

C.                     Evaluate the Pension Plan amendments and all benefits, and any other factors affecting the cost of the Plan, and quantify their impact on the funding of the Pension Plan.                     

D.                     Develop cost estimates on adding the following features/benefits to the Plan:

1.                     The cost of providing a survivor’s benefit equal to (a) 50% of the normal monthly benefit the deceased participant would receive if the deceased participant had worked to normal retirement date or (b) the vest accrued benefit of the deceased participant.

2.                     The cost of providing a disability benefit equal to (a) 100% of the normal monthly benefit the deceased participant would receive if the deceased participant had worked to normal retirement date or (b) the vest accrued benefit of the deceased participant.

3.                     The cost of increasing the benefit formula from 1.5% of final monthly compensation to 2% of final monthly compensation.  The cost of giving retroactive credit for such an increase for 5 prior years.

4.                     Changing the final average compensation period to the highest three (3) years in the final 10 years.

5.                     The adoption of a deferred retirement option program (“DROP”) similar to that available under APERS.

6.                     The cost of providing a fully subsidized early retirement after the completion of the 28 years of benefit service. 

                     Although some of the benefits may impact the cost of other benefits, it is requested that the actuarial firm provide an estimate of the incremental costs of providing each of the above additional plan features. 

The Actuarial Report at a Minimum Should Reflect the Following:

                     Management Summary

                     Summary of Participant Data

                     Development of the Contribution to designated benefit/design features.

                     Actuarial Cost Method and Actuarial Assumptions

                     Quick Reference Guide

 

III.                     RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS

A.                     Offerors are required to submit fifteen (15) copies of the proposal to:

                     Steve Kent, Purchasing Agent

                     City of Jonesboro

                     515 West Washington

                     Box 1845

                     Jonesboro, AR  72401-1845

B.                     Your bid submission must be the first document in your presentation.

C.                     The deadline for the submission of sealed proposals is 10:00 a.m. on May ___, 2008.  Facsimile copies will not be accepted.

D.                     The bid proposal package in response to this RFP, as a minimum, must include the following:

1.                     Firm’s name, home office address, address of office providing services under the contract and telephone number.

2.                     General description of the firm, primary business (consulting, pension planning, actuarial, insurance), other businesses or services provided, and legal form of organization.  Submit only other material that would provide a good description of the firm to the Finance Committee.

3.                     Identification of the actuary or actuaries available for the assignment.  The actuary shall meet the following minimum requirements:

a.                     Fellow or associate of the Society of Actuaries and/or Fellow of  the Conference of Actuaries in Public Practice and/or Member of the American Academy of Actuaries and/or meet standards of a qualified actuary under the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

b.                     Experience as a supervising actuary including consulting services, experience analysis and valuation assignments for major retirement systems, with specific reference to involvement with public retirement systems.

c.                     Ability to discuss in laymen’s terms:  actuarial theory; basis for assumptions; and other actuarial matters.

4.                     Identification of other personnel who will be performing work under the contract.

5.                     Provide summary resumes of supervisory and support personnel who will perform work under this contract.

6.                     Description of the computer equipment and programs used in this Assignment.

7.                     Statement of the availability and location of staff and other resources to perform all services and to provide deliverables within indicated time frames.

8.                     Statement as to whether or not the scope of services outlined can be performed using present staff and whether or not any work will be subcontracted.

9.                     List of public employee retirement systems which the firm currently provides actuarial or other consulting services, including system name, approximate number of participants and number of years firm has been retained.  Include the address, telephone number, and title of persons responsible for administering this system.

10.                     A description of how the firm intends to perform the City’s scope of services.

11.                     For the past three years, has your organization or any of its affiliates or parent or any officer or principal been involved in any business litigation, regulatory or legal proceeding?  If so, provide an explanation indicating the current status.  Explain the litigation and proceedings to which candidate had to respond as a trustee and not personally.

12.                     Describe any potential conflicts of interest your firm may have in providing these services to the City of Jonesboro.

13.                     Discuss other services that your firm provides relative to public employer pension plans, and how you will retain your independence and objectivity in evaluating the City’s Pension Plan.  Indicate if you, a parent or subsidiary of your firm would be interested in providing any pension plan services, if the City elects to competitively select one or more services in lieu of its current arrangements.

14.                     Identify two references for your firm in which you have provided services you consider to be most similar to the scope of services outlined in this RFP.  Include name of contact, address, telephone number, type of services and dates services were provided.

15.                     If there are other issues or information not covered in this RFP which you consider to be important or which would assist you in better responding to the scope of services, please identify and discuss those.

16.                     Submit a lump-sum fee for the assignment.  Anticipate no more than one meeting with the Finance Committee as part of the scope of services.  Also submit an hourly rate for additional services beyond the scope.

E.                     Scope of services must be completed and delivered to the City within 45 days of the execution of the engagement letter, and delivery of all materials necessary for the selected firm to perform the work.

 

IV.                     EVALUATION PROCESS

A.                     The City of Jonesboro will be the contracting entity for these services and will select the successful firm which will receive an engagement letter from the City.

B.                     Evaluation of the proposals will generally follow these criteria:

                     1.                     Conformity to the RFP.

2.                     Qualifications of personnel to be assigned to the engagement and successful experience of the firm in providing similar services on behalf of other public employer pension plans.

3.                     Evidence of the firm’s depth of experience and resources to provide the deliverables on a timely basis.

4.                     Fees which are consistent with the amount of work expected to provide the deliverable.

C.                     The Finance Committee will then recommend a single firm for contract award, who it determines offers the best qualified evaluated bid price.  A contract award is expected in June.  The City reserves the right to waive any and all informalities and to award the contract in the best interest of the City.

D.                     Any questions which arise prior to the submission of the proposals may be directed in writing to the Human Resource Director at the aforementioned address.  Responses will be in writing and will be shared with all potential offerors who are in receipt of the RFP.  No questions will be considered after June  ___, 2008.

E.                     Ex parte telephone contacts, emails, blogs or text messages with members of the Finance Committee or their immediate family members are prohibited during the pre-submittal or evaluation process stages.